Webinar: Sitting TAR-get? How Courts Are Turning the Screws on Technology-Assisted Review by Logikcull

Host Login

· Pacific Time (US & Canada) (GMT -8:00)
Add to calendar

About This Webinar

Courts are increasingly pressing for transparency and accountability in an area where both are in short supply: the use of technology-assisted review for discovery.

Join us as we unpack the recent history of TAR disputes, assess the impact of the judiciary’s increasingly hands-on approach to little-understood technology, and compare TAR costs, in the rare instances they’ve become known, to other alternatives.

Cases covered include In re Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan Products Liability Litigation, Lawson v. Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., and Livingston, et al. v. The City of Chicago.

1 hour of California MCLE credit available.

Agenda

Introductions
Recent TAR Caselaw
TAR and Transparency
TAR and Cost Shifting
Implications for Practitioners

Casey Sullivan

Casey Sullivan is an attorney and writer based out of San Francisco who leads Logikcull’s content and education efforts. In addition to organizing webinars, releasing white papers, and conducting industry surveys, he writes Logikcull’s news, discovery, and technology blog at logikcull.com/blog.

Robert Hilson

Vice President, Logikcull

Former executive director of the Association of Certified eDiscovery Specialists, Robert Hilson joined Logikcull almost six years ago and has not been told to leave. At Logikcull, Robert brings his extensive expertise to driving industry engagement and education around the most pressing discovery challenges.